Language：Japanese   Publisher：文部科学省科学技術学術政策研究所科学技術動向研究センター  

CiNii Article

CiNii Books

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：Japan Society for Research Policy and Innovation Management  

<p>This paper reviews existing papers and materials, and overviews features of the status quo and issues regarding the science, technology and innovation (STI) policy making system and processes in Japan in a few decades, as well as those regarding the whole institution related to policies in Japan beyond STI policies, based on the characteristics of STI policies <i>per se</i> and recent fundamental trends in research, technology, and innovation. Following the findings, this paper provides suggestions for development that are intended to contribute to the formulation of the sixth Science and Technology Basic Plan and so on.</p>

DOI： 10.20801/jsrpim.34.3_216

CiNii Article

CiNii Books

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：文部科学省科学技術学術政策研究所科学技術動向研究センター  

CiNii Article

CiNii Books

researchmap

Language：Japanese  

File： nopass_disp_file.pdf

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：文部科学省科学技術学術政策研究所科学技術動向研究センター  

DOI： 10.15108/stih.00151

CiNii Article

CiNii Books

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：Japan Society for Research Policy and Innovation Management  

<p>The "Delphi" related methods fostered the development of multiple survey practices. However, their mathematical theoretical validity and prediction accuracy have not been investigated in depth, especially from the perspective of mathematical or qualitative method.</p><p>In this paper, we run virtual subject experiment with agent-based simulations to verify the validity of the information obtained from two methods: a Delphi survey for a repeated questionnaire and a real-time Delphi method aimed to present the response status when a systematic information feedback is implemented according to predefined conditions /protocols.</p><p>In the results, the Delphi method emerges as a way to consolidate opinions and make them converge. On the contrary, the degree of consolidation/convergence ensured by the real-time Delphi method varies greatly across multiple simulations, even within the same respondents' group. Moreover, this method cannot be validated theoretically with respect to the statistical group response, as the basic Delphi principle is not satisfied.</p>

DOI： 10.20801/jsrpim.33.2_170

CiNii Article

CiNii Books

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：文部科学省科学技術学術政策研究所科学技術動向研究センター  

CiNii Article

CiNii Books

researchmap

Language：Japanese  

CiNii Article

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：文部科学省科学技術学術政策研究所科学技術動向研究センター  

CiNii Article

CiNii Books

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：文部科学省科学技術学術政策研究所科学技術動向研究センター  

CiNii Article

CiNii Books

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：文部科学省科学技術学術政策研究所科学技術動向研究センター  

DOI： 10.15108/stih.00080

CiNii Article

CiNii Books

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：文部科学省科学技術学術政策研究所科学技術動向研究センター  

CiNii Article

CiNii Books

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：統計情報研究開発センター  

CiNii Article

CiNii Books

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：広島大学高等教育研究開発センター  

The concept of "Full Economic Cost (fEC)" for research activities of the United Kingdom higher education institutions (HEIs) was created in the late 1990s; afterwards, in 2005 it was implemented. The whole costing system has been called the Transparent Approach to Costing (TRAC), and it has also been applied to education activities since 2008. All HEIs in the United Kingdom have to submit the annual TRAC returns to their funding agencies.The fEC is not only attributed to research costs based on the expenses measured by their financial accounting, but also includes the costs associated with their physical assets consumed in real terms and the necessary surplus for their future development. Its explicit objective was to secure a sustainable amount of public research money for their projects; however, there was the other implicit objective of concentrating the money on the limited number of research intensive institutions. Therefore, education-centered institutions have recognized this costing practice has been just an addition of paperwork from which they had not benefited. Although the funding agencies and their branched expert groups devoted much effort to promote several kinds of effective uses of the data produced by the TRAC in institutional management control, it has not been successful.According to analysis based on the HESA Finance Plus data, both explicit and implicit objectives above have been successfully achieved. Regarding the explicit objective to secure a sustainable amount of public research money, the analysis found that it had been increasing by more than the price index hike after TRAC was adopted. On the other hand, Gini-coefficient of pubic research income distributed to the UK HEIs had been increasing during the same period; which means the disparity between research intensive institutions and others had been widening. It fits the implicit objective.It can be concluded that this kind of costing practice is effective to make persuasive evidences in order to secure public research money; however, it is difficult to effectively use the cost data for institutional management control. It could be an important implication for Japan if similar costing practice were introduced.

DOI： 10.15027/42971

CiNii Article

CiNii Books

researchmap

Other Link： http://ir.lib.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/00042971

Language：Japanese   Publisher：北海学園大学経済学会  

CiNii Article

CiNii Books

researchmap

Other Link： http://hokuga.hgu.jp/dspace/handle/123456789/2800

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)   Publisher：ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC  

The significance of a computer-based approach in roadmapping processes will increase in accordance with the ever-larger number of scientific publications and enhanced computing technologies. This article proposes a method to analyse chronological changes in research topics as observed from proceedings papers and conference sessions using a text-mining technique, which enables us to detect, identify, and analyse the evolutionary process of emerging technologies in the many rapidly growing research fields. Chronological networks of conference sessions from World Wide Web conferences between 2002 and 2011 are used to visualize the scientific and technical streams formed by the session sequences. The chronological networks demonstrate the evolutionary process of 'Social Networks', 'Monetization' and 'Semantic Analysis' studies. In the evolutionary process of emerging web-based technology, the convergent session nodes that recapitulate past research topics and the divergent session nodes in the networks play significant roles in promoting dynamic interactions among research topics. The proposed method is distinctive in that it is prospective: the session titles reflect future perspectives, including researchers' expectations for pioneering new research fields within a scientific community. This article also discusses the characteristics of a textual method for scientific publication analysis in terms from the aspect coverage, data, links and stability.

DOI： 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.03.013

Web of Science

Scopus

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (international conference proceedings)   Publisher：IEEE  

This paper addresses the need for reliable measurement guidelines for organizations or entities in the turbulent environment of our era of data deluge. Based upon conceptual and empirical research in bibliometrics, we suggest an analytical approach to benchmarking the technology management of surprising and potentially damaging phenomena. In order to do so, we propose a method called 'double-loop benchmarking,' which consists of two steps: (1) structural benchmarking, based upon social relationships between actors and actants, and (2) projecting transaction data accumulated through daily business processes as benchmark indicators based upon the social relationships empirically measured in the first step. This paper can be seen as part of a broader agenda for how to manage during continuous but unpredictable change in circumstances of open ignorance. As an empirical study in bibliometrics, we propose a methodological improvement in scientometrics using data repurposing and triangulations. An international comparative analysis reveals empirical evidence that Japan's dynamic technology portfolio on research activities in the fields of electrics, electronics, information, and communications has consistently deviated from that in global trends since the 1990s. This phenomenon, which may be described as the 'Galapagos Syndrome,' is a strategic pitfall under the dynamic technology paradigm change.

Web of Science

Scopus

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (international conference proceedings)  

researchmap

Language：Japanese  

File： 白川(2012）科学技術・イノベーション政策と公共選択論.pdf

CiNii Article

CiNii Books

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：文部科学省科学技術政策研究所科学技術動向研究センター  

CiNii Article

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)   Publisher：SPRINGER  

The issue of international student mobility has had a profound effect on policy decision-making in the higher education system of essentially every country; however, the statistical data on this subject are insufficient, especially for graduate students. The purposes of this study are to substantiate the state of international mobility among talented graduate students in the sciences and engineering who will publish scholarly research in their future career and to present the mechanism of their moves between institutions. This paper quantitatively analyzes the trajectories of more than 7,000 scientists and engineers beginning at graduate school, obtained from the biographical notes attached to journal articles for authors in the fields of computer vision, robotics, and electron devices. The results suggest that mobility in various engineering fields at world-class research universities is subject to varied pull and push factors. In the fields of computer vision and robotics, a high world university ranking is a significant pull factor in the global mobility of graduate students, which may promote a US-dominated stratification between institutions of higher education, since the institutions at the top end of these rankings are generally in the United States. In contrast, in the field of electron devices, employment for highly skilled workers in domestic industries seems to act as an alternative pull factor for talented graduate students. This article also sheds light on the status of the universities that underpin first-tier research universities by providing undergraduate students to them, an important role that tends to be concealed in the world university rankings. Furthermore, this article suggests the existence of complementary relationships between the globally top-ranked research universities and the exporting top national research universities in various countries, a relationship that is key to the shape of the current global higher education system. © 2012 The Author(s).

DOI： 10.1007/s10734-012-9586-4

Web of Science

Scopus

researchmap

Other Link： http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10734-012-9586-4

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)   Publisher：SPRINGER  

This study analysed the technical and publication activities of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineering (IEEE), the most influential academic publisher in engineering. We first constructed an original comprehensive database of periodicals (journal and magazine) and conference proceedings published by the IEEE between 1980 and 2008, which comprised approximately 0.36 million periodical articles and 1.14 million conference articles. We analysed the transitions in technical innovations from two perspectives: trends within (1) individual countries and (2) specialized fields represented in IEEE societies. The number of published periodical articles increased fourfold between 1980 and 2008, while that of published conference articles increased nearly 20-fold in the same period. In particular, the number of conference articles published by China increased dramatically from 2002, exceeding even the number published by the US in 2008. The IEEE has increasingly shifted away from its US-centred origins to literally becoming the 'electrical and electronics association of the world'. The proportion of articles published by authors in North America, Europe and East Asia has increasingly balanced, thus leading to the formation of a tri-polar structure of IEEE technological activities. This comprehensive analysis of IEEE publications over a period of almost 30 years revealed that with the emergence of more active international competition, 'glocalisation' is occurring among publications and research activities of the IEEE. Consequently, quantitative analysis revealed structural changes in global competition and technological transition characterized by five phases. © 2011 Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary.

DOI： 10.1007/s11192-011-0566-8

Web of Science

Scopus

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：科学技術と経済の会  

CiNii Article

CiNii Books

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)   Publisher：SPRINGER  

We investigated author information in scientific articles by approximately 7,000 researchers for a quantitative analysis of researchers' international mobility. From top journals, we traced the movements of more than 2,200 researchers in the research domains of robotics, computer vision and electron devices. We categorized countries' characteristics for the balance between the inflow and the outflow of researchers moving internationally. Flow patterns of international mobility confirm that the United States, China and India exhibit the greatest global flows of researchers, with Singapore and Hong Kong attracting remarkable numbers of researchers from other countries. International mobility focusing on institutions reveals that universities in Singapore receive as many foreign researchers as do research universities in the United States. Furthermore, firms and international collaborative research institutes act as alternative receivers to the universities in the electron devices research domain. © 2011 Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary.

DOI： 10.1007/s11192-011-0545-0

Web of Science

Scopus

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (scientific journal)   Publisher：SPRINGER  

This study proposes a quantitative analysis of researcher mobility (i.e. transfer from one institution to another) and collaborative networks on the basis of author background data extracted from biographical notes in scientific articles to identify connections that are not revealed via simple co-authorship analysis. Using a top-ranked journal in the field of computer vision, we create a layered network that describes various aspects of author backgrounds, demonstrating a geographical distribution of institutions. We classify networks according to various dimensions including authors, institutions and countries. The results of the quantitative analysis indicate that mobility networks extend beyond the typical collaborative networks describing institutional and international relationships. We also discuss sectoral collaboration considering the mobility networks. Our findings indicate a limitation of collaborative analysis based on bibliometric data and the importance of tracing researcher mobility within potential networks to identify the true nature of scientific collaboration. © 2011 Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary.

DOI： 10.1007/s11192-011-0360-7

Web of Science

Scopus

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：文部科学省科学技術政策研究所科学技術動向研究センター  

CiNii Article

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (international conference proceedings)   Publisher：IEEE  

The international mobility of robotics researchers is quantitatively evaluated by analyzing biographical notes accompanying journal papers. Mobility patterns illustrate that the United States, Canada, and Singapore attract robotics researchers from abroad as IQ magnets. Canada can be considered as an alternative to the United States for hosting Iranian robotics researchers. The relationship between the number of authors and bachelor's degree holders categorizes countries as hosts or sources of researchers. The characteristics of active topics of robotics research in major countries are also mentioned. © 2011 IEEE.

DOI： 10.1109/IEEM.2011.6117960

Web of Science

Scopus

researchmap

Language：English   Publisher：Science & Technology Foresight Center（NISTEP)  

CiNii Article

researchmap

Language：English   Publisher：Science & Technology Foresight Center（NISTEP)  

CiNii Article

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (international conference proceedings)  

To provide further insight into globalization of research and development (R&D) activities, this study examines the nature of electrical and electronics (E&E) and information communication technology (ICT) research, and identifies the global shifts that have occurred in publication activities under the assumption of a definite correlation between research activities and publication activities. This study analyzed the technical and publication activities of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineering (IEEE), the largest professional engineering association and the most influential academic publisher in engineering. We first constructed an original comprehensive database of periodical (journal and magazine) articles and conference proceedings published by IEEE between 1980 and 2008, which comprised approximately 355,000 periodical articles and 1.14 million conference proceedings. We analyzed the transitions in technical innovations from two perspectives: (1) trends within individual countries, specifically those within the country represented by the first author listed in each IEEE publication, and (2) trends within specialized fields represented in IEEE societies and technical councils. The number of published periodical articles increased fourfold between 1980 and 2008, while that of published conference proceedings increased more than tenfold since 1988. In particular, the number of conference proceedings published by China has increased dramatically since 2002, even exceeding the number published by the U.S. in 2008. As technologically emerging countries have increasingly contributed to article production, IEEE has increasingly moved away from its U.S.-centered origins to literally become the "electrical and electronics association of the world." The proportion of articles published by authors in North America, Europe, and East Asia has become increasingly balanced, leading to the formation of a tri-polar structure of IEEE technological activities. Within this structure, North America focuses on the field of ICT, Europe focuses on the fields of ICT and E&E, and East Asia focuses on the field of E&E. This comprehensive analysis of IEEE publications over a period of almost 30 years revealed that with the emergence of more active international competition, glocalization is occurring among the publications and research activities of IEEE, and that the nature of E&E and ICT research is under a system in which the U.S. sets an agenda for technical innovation that stimulates research activities in each country. © 2011 IEEE.

DOI： 10.1109/ITMC.2011.5995942

Scopus

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publishing type：Research paper (bulletin of university, research institution)   Publisher：文部科学省科学技術政策研究所科学技術動向研究センター  

CiNii Article

researchmap

Language：English   Publishing type：Research paper (international conference proceedings)  

We organized a database of IEEE Periodicals from a period of over 15 years for quantitative and collective analysis. We found that the IEEE experienced globalization and more active international competition. East Asian countries and regions have grown dramatically and become major players in the IEEE during globalization over the last decade, and: 1) East Asia surpassed North America in research related to electrical and electronics fields; 2) China has the most balanced and rapidly increasing number of articles in all fields; 3) Taiwan specializes in circuits, systems, and electronic devices; 4) South Korea specializes in consumer electronics, broadcasting, and communications; and 5) Singapore owes much to the existence of two research universities. ©2010 IEEE.

DOI： 10.1109/IEEM.2010.5674244

Scopus

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：Hiroshima University  

CiNii Article

CiNii Books

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：Hiroshima University  

The purpose of this paper is threefold: (i) to promote partnership and outreach at Hiroshima University; (ii) to describe the awareness and response of faculty at the Japanese national university corporations with regard to the transformation of national universities as university corporations; and (iii) to analyze the research and development of the service mission of Japanese universities from the perspective of governing institutions of higher education. The analysis was conducted based on the experiences of the two authors as practitioners: one is a faculty member in charge of outreach at a national university corporation who has also worked at MITI (equivalent to the current Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry), a professional service firm, and a start-up company;the other is a practitioner in the fields of public management, regional science, and technology policy. Ninety faculty members at a major national university corporation were interviewed immediately after its incorporation in April 2004. The authors analyzed their awareness about the academic profession and the challenges in organizational management of the national university corporations based on the comparison with private professional organizations. It was found that the response toward the transformation of universities into an" entrepreneurial university,"as termed by B. R. Clark, has potential at the individual faculty level. However, at the organizational level,a major managerial challenge was suggested: Japanese national universities have transformed systems through" tough management" such as an introduction of a system to hire academic professionals based on a certain term. On the other hand, they have maintained a traditional management style based on Japanese organizational practices, including the seniority system. The specific concern was that the extent to which ayoung faculty member will contribute responsibly to the management of a university corporation is uncertain and that their motivation toward a good education as well as morale might be lowered.In conclusion, it is impetrative for national university corporations to plan career designs such that they are appealing to academic professionals as career paths and to implement organizational decentralization based ona strategic plan. In other words, a management reform exemplified by New Public Management is necessary to facilitate the entrepreneurship of the academic profession. The views expressed in this paper do not reflect the opinions authorized by the above organizations that the authors belong to.

DOI： 10.15027/19803

CiNii Article

CiNii Books

researchmap

Other Link： http://ir.lib.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/00019803

Language：Japanese   Publisher：広島大学マネジメント学会  

「行政評価」は, 日本の自治体において1990年代末の5年間に急速に普及しつつある制度であり, 行政評価手法などの研究自体も急速に増加している。しかし, 近年の行政評価をめぐる議論は論者によって多様であり, 行政評価の手法の理論に関する研究と実務現場における実務者の認識との間には隔たりが大きい。地方自治体の行政実務の現場における「事務事業評価」などを端緒とする行政評価制度の導入の意義と革新性は, 自治体の組織変革の過程において, 既存の行政組織にフィットした簡便で実用的なツールとして, マネジメント改革の梃子としての作用しえた点にある。本稿では, 民間企業における経営理念・手法, 成功事例などを行政現場に導入を通じて行政部門の効率化・活性化を図るニュー・パブリック・マネジメントを基本に, オズボーンの言うReinvention(政府の再発明)という観点から, 地方自治体の「組織変革」に行政評価の果たした役割の分析を通じ, 自治体という組織の改革に必要な条件を明らかにしている。行政評価とは, アメリカ流のパフォーマンス・メジャーメント, パフォーマンス・モニタリング(業績測定・監視)が, 政策科学や経営学の素地が不十分であった日本の地方自治体において, 「事務事業評価」等という日本独自の形に変形・制度化され, 実務のなかで確立されてきた概念である。行政評価制度は, 官僚制組織のなかに, 予算・事務・事業といった既存の行政組織の基本的スキーマを用いて, 業務の継続的改善と成果志向のマネジメントを, 事後的に埋め込み, 組織の根源的な仮定として働いてきた組織文化の見直しを迫るツールとして作用しうる。しかし, 単に評価制度を導入しても行広島大学大学院社会科学研究科マネジメント専攻平成13年度(2002年3月)修士論文要旨

CiNii Article

CiNii Books

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：中国地方総合研究センタ-  

File： 季刊　中国総研　2001.vol5-3，NO16　（村岡、白川）印刷用　.pdf

CiNii Article

CiNii Books

researchmap

Responsible for pages：465  

researchmap

Total pages：944   Responsible for pages：274-275   Language：Japanese Book type：Dictionary, encyclopedia

researchmap

Responsible for pages：570-571   Language：Japanese

researchmap

Responsible for pages：194-198   Language：Japanese Book type：Textbook, survey, introduction

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：時事通信社  

CiNii Article

CiNii Books

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：時事通信社  

CiNii Article

CiNii Books

researchmap

Authorship：Lead author   Language：Japanese   Publishing type：Article, review, commentary, editorial, etc. (trade magazine, newspaper, online media)  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：文部科学省科学技術学術政策研究所科学技術動向研究センター  

CiNii Article

CiNii Books

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：文部科学省科学技術学術政策研究所科学技術動向研究センター  

CiNii Article

CiNii Books

researchmap

J-GLOBAL

researchmap

J-GLOBAL

researchmap

Language：Japanese  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：研究・イノベーション学会  

一般講演要旨

CiNii Article

researchmap

DOI： 10.15108/rm283

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：Transdisciplinary Federation of Science and Technology  

DOI： 10.11487/trafst.13.1_59

CiNii Article

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：文部科学省科学技術学術政策研究所科学技術動向研究センター  

CiNii Article

CiNii Books

researchmap

J-GLOBAL

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：研究・イノベーション学会  

一般講演要旨

CiNii Article

researchmap

Language：English  

researchmap

“Science and Technology Indicators” is a basic resource for understanding Japanese science and technology activities based on objective and quantitative data. It classifies science and technology activities into five categories, such as R&amp;D Expenditure; R&amp;D Personnel; Higher Education and S&amp;T personnel; Output of R&amp;D; and Science, Technology, and Innovation and shows the state of<br />
Japanese science and technology activities with approximately 160 indicators. The report is published annually and shows the latest results of the analyses of scientific publications and patent applications conducted by the NISTEP.<br />
This edition of “Science and Technology Indicators 2018” includes new indicators such as “the situation of the term of office of researchers at universities, etc.,” “trial analysis on the trend of papers in social sciences,” “relationship between paper-to-paper citations and paper-to-patent family citations,” “patent application trends in automobile manufacturing industry.” In total, 21 indicators were newly introduced or visualization methods were revised. Also, in the commemoration of the 30th anniversary of NISTEP, a special column on episodes, etc. from the birth to the development stage of science and technology indicators is included.<br />
Overviewing the latest Japan’s situation from “Science and Technology Indicators 2018,” it was found that the R&amp;D expenditure and the number of researchers in Japan are the third largest in major countries (Japan, U.S., Germany, France, U.K., China and Korea). The number of papers in Japan (fraction counting method) is the fourth in the world and the number of papers with high citations is the ninth. Japan continues to be the world first place in the patent family (patent applications to more than two countries). These trends continue from the previous edition. The number of collaborative research between Japanese universities and private firms and the amount of research funding received steadily increase. Although the number of companies&#039; papers is decreasing, the proportion of the number of industry-academia collaborative papers among them has increased, and the weight of universities in research activities of private firms that produce papers is increasing.

researchmap

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：文部科学省科学技術学術政策研究所科学技術動向研究センター  

CiNii Article

CiNii Books

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：文部科学省科学技術学術政策研究所科学技術動向研究センター  

CiNii Article

CiNii Books

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：研究・イノベーション学会  

一般講演要旨

CiNii Article

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：研究・イノベーション学会  

一般講演要旨

CiNii Article

researchmap

researchmap

Language：Japanese  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：研究・技術計画学会  

一般講演要旨

DOI： 10.20801/randi.29.0_786

CiNii Article

CiNii Books

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：研究・技術計画学会  

一般講演要旨

CiNii Article

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：科学技術政策研究所 科学技術動向研究センター  

CiNii Article

CiNii Books

researchmap

Other Link： http://hdl.handle.net/11035/2395

Language：Japanese   Publishing type：Rapid communication, short report, research note, etc. (bulletin of university, research institution)  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：研究・技術計画学会  

一般講演要旨

CiNii Article

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publishing type：Rapid communication, short report, research note, etc. (bulletin of university, research institution)  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publishing type：Article, review, commentary, editorial, etc. (bulletin of university, research institution)  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：科学技術政策研究所 科学技術動向研究センター  

CiNii Article

CiNii Books

researchmap

Other Link： http://hdl.handle.net/11035/2220

Language：Japanese   Publisher：研究・技術計画学会  

一般講演要旨

CiNii Article

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：研究・技術計画学会  

一般講演要旨

CiNii Article

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：研究・技術計画学会  

一般講演要旨

CiNii Article

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：科学技術政策研究所 科学技術動向研究センター  

CiNii Article

CiNii Books

researchmap

Other Link： http://hdl.handle.net/11035/2184

Language：Japanese   Publishing type：Internal/External technical report, pre-print, etc.  

CiNii Article

CiNii Books

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publishing type：Rapid communication, short report, research note, etc. (bulletin of university, research institution)  

J-GLOBAL

researchmap

Language：Japanese  

J-GLOBAL

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：研究・技術計画学会  

一般講演要旨

CiNii Article

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：研究・技術計画学会  

一般講演要旨

CiNii Article

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：研究・技術計画学会  

一般講演要旨

CiNii Article

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publishing type：Research paper, summary (national, other academic conference)  

J-GLOBAL

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publishing type：Internal/External technical report, pre-print, etc.  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Publisher：研究・技術計画学会  

一般講演要旨

DOI： 10.20801/randi.22.0_18

CiNii Article

CiNii Books

researchmap

Event date： 2021.12

Language：Japanese   Presentation type：Symposium, workshop panel (public)  

researchmap

Event date： 2020.11

Language：Japanese   Presentation type：Oral presentation (invited, special)  

researchmap

Event date： 2020

researchmap

Event date： 2020

researchmap

Event date： 2016.11

Language：Japanese  

一般講演要旨

researchmap

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Presentation type：Oral presentation (invited, special)  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Presentation type：Symposium, workshop panel (nominated)  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Presentation type：Oral presentation (invited, special)  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Presentation type：Symposium, workshop panel (nominated)  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)  

Venue：トロント、カナダ  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)  

researchmap

Language：English  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Presentation type：Symposium, workshop panel (nominated)  

researchmap

Language：English   Presentation type：Symposium, workshop panel (nominated)  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)  

researchmap

Language：English   Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)  

researchmap

Language：Japanese  

researchmap

Language：English   Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Presentation type：Public lecture, seminar, tutorial, course, or other speech  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)  

researchmap

Language：English   Presentation type：Symposium, workshop panel (public)  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Presentation type：Oral presentation (invited, special)  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Presentation type：Oral presentation (invited, special)  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)  

researchmap

Language：English   Presentation type：Symposium, workshop panel (nominated)  

researchmap

Language：English   Presentation type：Symposium, workshop panel (nominated)  

researchmap

Language：English   Presentation type：Symposium, workshop panel (nominated)  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)  

researchmap

Language：Japanese  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Presentation type：Oral presentation (general)  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Presentation type：Symposium, workshop panel (nominated)  

researchmap

Language：Japanese   Presentation type：Symposium, workshop panel (public)  

researchmap